Andreas von Bülow, German Minister & intelligence intimate: 9/11 a covert US false flag operation

Andreas von Bülow, was born on 17 July 1937. He served as state-secretary in the German Federal Ministry of Defence (1976-1980), as German Minister for Research and Technology (1980-1982) and for 25 years overall as an SPD member of the German parliament (1969-1994). In the late 1980s and early 1990s, he served on the parliamentary committee on intelligence services ("Parlamentarischer Kontrollausschuss") (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_von_B%C3%BClow ).

Andreas von Bülow on US intelligence and US Government involvement in the 9/11 atrocity (2002): “Planning the attacks was a master deed, in technical and organizational terms. To hijack four big airliners within a few minutes and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing so on complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing from the secret apparatuses of state and industry… If what I say is right, the whole US government should end up behind bars…They have hidden behind a veil of secrecy and destroyed the evidence - that they invented the story of 19 Muslims working within Osama bin Laden’s al-Qa'eda - in order to hide the truth of their own covert operation.” [1].

[1]. Andreas von Bulow, Tagesspiegel, 13. Jan. 2002; quoted here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_von_B%C3%BClow .

Albert Stubblebine, former Head of US Army Intelligence: explosive demolition of WTC buildings on 9/11 & Media, Government lying

Major General Albert N. Stubblebine was a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy West Point, class of 52, and had a distinguished 32 year career in the U.S. Army. He retired as the Commanding General of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command, INSCOM (see Wikipedia: : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Stubblebine ).

Major General Albert N. Stubblebine on explosive demolition of the WTC buildings in the 9-11 atrocity and subsequent Government and Mainstream media lying (2009): “You look at the buildings falling, they didn’t fall down because of an airplane hit them, they fell down because explosives went off inside. Demolition. Look at Building 7 for God sakes … I do not believe the free press is free anymore… The press is saying what they have been told to say about this. Now do I have proof about this? No. But I believe that all the stories that were told about 9/11 were false… What is it they do not want the public to know?” [1].

Major General Albert Stubblebine in a video documentary (2006): “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, “The plane does not fit in that hole”. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?” [2].

[1]. “Major General Albert Stubblebine: Towers fell down because of explosives”, World for 9-11 Truth, 29 June 2009: http://world911truth.org/major-general-albert-stubblebine-towers-fell-down-because-of-explosives/ ).

[2]. Major General Albert Stubblebine, quoted in “USA military officers challenge official account of September 11”, Axis of Logic, 29 May 2008 (ex Pakistan Daily) : http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/printer_26828.shtml .

SCHOLARS FOR 9/11 TRUTH & JUSTICE: science-based demolition hypothesis alternative to the "official story" of 9-11

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice in their own words: “We are a group of scholars and supporters endeavoring to address the unanswered questions of the September 11, 2001 attack through scientific research and public education. We take care to present the strongest, most credible research available, some of which is published on our sister site, the Journal of 9/11 Studies ” (see: http://stj911.org/index.html ).

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice on controlled demolition of WTC on 9-11: “The principle alternative to the official theory that the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 suffered spontaneous structural collapses is the theory that they were destroyed through controlled demolition by pre-positioned devices. This is the only serious alternative to the official theory, since the other theories -- such as those involving exotic weapons or accidental explosions -- lack even rudimentary plausibility. Given this dichotomy, a disproof of the collapse theory in its most general form constitutes a proof of the demolition theory in its most general form. Any comprehensive theory describing the means and methods of controlled demolition applied to the WTC buildings is necessarily speculative, particularly given the paucity of artifacts that survived the Ground Zero cleanup operation. However, specific sets observations may indicate the use of certain demolition methods, perhaps as part of wider array of methods. One such set of observations has been adduced by Dr. Steven E Jones as evidence of the use of aluminothermics in the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers. Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?
by Dr. Steven E Jones.” [1].

[1]. Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, “Hypotheses: principal alternative theories of the attack”: http://stj911.org/hypotheses/alternative.html .

Professor Peter Hans Santschi, environmental chemist, disputes "official story" of 9-11

Peter Hans Santschi has been Professor of Oceanography and Marine Sciences, Texas A&M University since 1988 in the fields of Chemistry, Marine and Environmental Chemistry (see: http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/mempages/Santschi.html ).

Professor Peter Hans Santschi on 9-11: “"The official story does not make sense, because it flies in the face of scientific principles and the laws of science. You cannot fool Newton's Laws, which means that the official story on how the three WTC towers fell on their footprint at near-free-fall acceleration due to fires insults anybody's mind who is still able to think on their own. And that you cannot melt steel by burning jet fuel should be evident to anybody who has ever watched airplane engines burn jet fuel without the steel of the engines melting. What is even more incredulous is that there are not more people in the USA questioning the official story.” [1].

[1]. Scientists for 9-11 truth, “Peter Hans Santschi”: http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/mempages/Santschi.html .