Thursday, September 15, 2011

Andreas von Bülow, German Minister & intelligence intimate: 9/11 a covert US false flag operation

Andreas von Bülow, was born on 17 July 1937. He served as state-secretary in the German Federal Ministry of Defence (1976-1980), as German Minister for Research and Technology (1980-1982) and for 25 years overall as an SPD member of the German parliament (1969-1994). In the late 1980s and early 1990s, he served on the parliamentary committee on intelligence services ("Parlamentarischer Kontrollausschuss") (see: ).

Andreas von Bülow on US intelligence and US Government involvement in the 9/11 atrocity (2002): “Planning the attacks was a master deed, in technical and organizational terms. To hijack four big airliners within a few minutes and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing so on complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing from the secret apparatuses of state and industry… If what I say is right, the whole US government should end up behind bars…They have hidden behind a veil of secrecy and destroyed the evidence - that they invented the story of 19 Muslims working within Osama bin Laden’s al-Qa'eda - in order to hide the truth of their own covert operation.” [1].

[1]. Andreas von Bulow, Tagesspiegel, 13. Jan. 2002; quoted here: .

Albert Stubblebine, former Head of US Army Intelligence: explosive demolition of WTC buildings on 9/11 & Media, Government lying

Major General Albert N. Stubblebine was a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy West Point, class of 52, and had a distinguished 32 year career in the U.S. Army. He retired as the Commanding General of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command, INSCOM (see Wikipedia: : ).

Major General Albert N. Stubblebine on explosive demolition of the WTC buildings in the 9-11 atrocity and subsequent Government and Mainstream media lying (2009): “You look at the buildings falling, they didn’t fall down because of an airplane hit them, they fell down because explosives went off inside. Demolition. Look at Building 7 for God sakes I do not believe the free press is free anymore… The press is saying what they have been told to say about this. Now do I have proof about this? No. But I believe that all the stories that were told about 9/11 were false… What is it they do not want the public to know?” [1].

Major General Albert Stubblebine in a video documentary (2006): “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, “The plane does not fit in that hole”. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?” [2].

[1]. “Major General Albert Stubblebine: Towers fell down because of explosives”, World for 9-11 Truth, 29 June 2009: ).

[2]. Major General Albert Stubblebine, quoted in “USA military officers challenge official account of September 11”, Axis of Logic, 29 May 2008 (ex Pakistan Daily) : .

SCHOLARS FOR 9/11 TRUTH & JUSTICE: science-based demolition hypothesis alternative to the "official story" of 9-11

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice in their own words: “We are a group of scholars and supporters endeavoring to address the unanswered questions of the September 11, 2001 attack through scientific research and public education. We take care to present the strongest, most credible research available, some of which is published on our sister site, the Journal of 9/11 Studies (see: ).

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice on controlled demolition of WTC on 9-11: The principle alternative to the official theory that the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 suffered spontaneous structural collapses is the theory that they were destroyed through controlled demolition by pre-positioned devices. This is the only serious alternative to the official theory, since the other theories -- such as those involving exotic weapons or accidental explosions -- lack even rudimentary plausibility. Given this dichotomy, a disproof of the collapse theory in its most general form constitutes a proof of the demolition theory in its most general form. Any comprehensive theory describing the means and methods of controlled demolition applied to the WTC buildings is necessarily speculative, particularly given the paucity of artifacts that survived the Ground Zero cleanup operation. However, specific sets observations may indicate the use of certain demolition methods, perhaps as part of wider array of methods. One such set of observations has been adduced by Dr. Steven E Jones as evidence of the use of aluminothermics in the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers. Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?
by Dr. Steven E Jones.” [1].

[1]. Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, “Hypotheses: principal alternative theories of the attack”: .

Professor Peter Hans Santschi, environmental chemist, disputes "official story" of 9-11

Peter Hans Santschi has been Professor of Oceanography and Marine Sciences, Texas A&M University since 1988 in the fields of Chemistry, Marine and Environmental Chemistry (see: ).

Professor Peter Hans Santschi on 9-11: “"The official story does not make sense, because it flies in the face of scientific principles and the laws of science. You cannot fool Newton's Laws, which means that the official story on how the three WTC towers fell on their footprint at near-free-fall acceleration due to fires insults anybody's mind who is still able to think on their own. And that you cannot melt steel by burning jet fuel should be evident to anybody who has ever watched airplane engines burn jet fuel without the steel of the engines melting. What is even more incredulous is that there are not more people in the USA questioning the official story.” [1].

[1]. Scientists for 9-11 truth, “Peter Hans Santschi”: .

Dr Alan Sabrosky, Jewish American ex-Marine: "It is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation"

Dr Alan Sabrosky is Jewish American, a PhD from the University of Michigan, a US Marine Corps veteran, a Vietnam veteran, a graduate of the US Army War College and a Director of Studies at the US Army War College for 5 and a half years (see: ).

Dr Alan Sabrosky on the PNAC Pearl Harbor strategy, the explosive demolition if the WTC and the need for assistance (US, Israeli) on the ground (2009): The attacks on September 11, 2001 have been a defining moment for America. The political and psychological impact on Americans of a concerted and visible attack in America was enormous -- indeed, it is an interesting "coincidence" that the attacks occurred on the one day of the year whose mention reinforces a public sense here of danger and emergency: 9-1-1. A significant development in the 1990s was the formation of the neo-conservative think tank known as PNAC (Project for a New American Century), whose members prepared position papers for the Israeli government and for a future US Administration sharing their views. That happened in 2000 with the election of George W. Bush, and a contemporary writer summarized the tip of the neo-conservative iceberg in his first Administration this way: The "outsiders" from PNAC were now powerful "insiders," placed in important positions from which they could exert maximum pressure on US policy…PNAC had a lock on military policy-creation in the Bush Administration. Especially significant in terms of subsequent events was the acknowledgement in one of PNAC's own documents that their program for America (and Israel) would not readily be accepted by the American people. What this meant, PNAC opined in 2000, was that "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor… First, the striking aircraft alone simply could not have brought down either of the two buildings in the manner in which they fell, much less a third building which was not hit by a plane…This means the attackers had assistance on the ground, and it had to have been active before the attacks occurred: preparing buildings for controlled demolition is not something done haphazardly in the midst of chaos. Second, only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets, access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground: our CIA and Israel's Mossad. Only one had the incentive, using the “who benefits” principle: Mossad. And that incentive dovetailed perfectly with the neo-con’s agenda and explicitly expressed need for a catalytic event to mobilize the American public for their wars, using American military power to destroy Israel’s enemies.” [1].

Dr Alan Sabrosky in interview with Mark Glenn and a USS Liberty survivor (Phil Tourney) on Israeli responsibility for 9-11 and the dire consequences for decent, patriotic Jewish Americans if this becomes generally accepted (2010): “What we need to stand up and say is that not only did they attack the USS Liberty, they did 9/11. They did it. I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period. You know, Phil, I don't denigrate what happened to USS Liberty in the slightest - you understand that - but for most Americans what happened to the USS Liberty, or in Vietnam, was history. Now this is history. You know, they can be concerned about it, but they're not going to get mad about it. 9/11 has led directly to 60,000 Americans dead and wounded, God knows how many hundreds of thousands of people in other countries that we've killed or wounded or made homeless, and it's an on-going sore. It's not your sore from the USS Liberty, it's not my sore from Vietnam. Both of us have those, both of us care about. But this is an open wound. And what Americans need to understand is that they did it. They did it. And if they do understand that, Israel's going to disappear. Israel will flat-ass disappear from this Earth.I sent a film to one of my colleagues and it basically had Americans grieving over their dead coming back. And I showed one of them - it was a woman - just wrenched by grief over her dead soldier. And I said, you know, if Americans ever know that Israel did this, they're gonna scrub them off the Earth, and they're not gonna give a rat's ass - forgive my language - what the cost is. They are not going to care. They will do it. And they should. And they should.” [2].

[1]. Dr Alan Sabrosky, “Treason, betrayal and deceit: 9/11 and beyond”, Information Clearing House, 10 September 2009: .

[2]. Dr Alan Sabrosky in interview with Mark Glenn (2010), Full transcript of interview, Uprooted Palestinians, 21 March 2010: .

Dr Paul Craig Roberts: Government & MSM lying & "[US] government’s 9/11 conspiracy theory"

Paul Craig Roberts (born April 3, 1939, in Atlanta, Georgia) is an economist and a nationally syndicated columnist for Creators Syndicate; served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration (so-called father of Reaganomics”, and former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service. PhD from University of Virginia, he has written or co-written eight books, contributed chapters to numerous books and has published many articles in journals of scholarship. He has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy (see: ).

Dr Paul Craig Roberts on truth, liberty, media lying and US government’s 9-11 conspiracy theory: “There was a time when the pen was mightier than the sword. That was a time when people believed in truth and regarded truth as an independent power and not as an auxiliary for government, class, race, ideological, personal, or financial interest. Today Americans are ruled by propaganda. Americans have little regard for truth, little access to it, and little ability to recognize it. Truth is an unwelcome entity. It is disturbing. It is off limits. Those who speak it run the risk of being branded “anti-American,” “anti-semite” or “conspiracy theorist.” Truth is an inconvenience for government and for the interest groups whose campaign contributions control government. Truth is an inconvenience for prosecutors who want convictions, not the discovery of innocence or guilt. Truth is inconvenient for ideologues. Today many whose goal once was the discovery of truth are now paid handsomely to hide it... The American corporate does not serve the truth. It serves the government and the interest groups that empower the government. America’s fate was sealed when the public and the anti-war movement bought the government’s 9/11 conspiracy theory. The government’s account of 9/11 is contradicted by much evidence. Nevertheless, this defining event of our time, which has launched the US on interminable wars of aggression and a domestic police state, is a taboo topic for investigation in the media. It is pointless to complain of war and a police state when one accepts the premise upon which they are based. These trillion dollar wars have created financing problems for Washington’s deficits and threaten the U.S. dollar’s role as world reserve currency. The wars and the pressure that the budget deficits put on the dollar’s value have put Social Security and Medicare on the chopping block.” [1].

[1]. Paul Craig Roberts, “Goodbye. Truith has fallen and taken liberty with it”, 9-11, 24 March 2010: .

Former Malaysian PM Dr Mahathir Mohamad: American Government did 9-11

Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad (born 10 July 1925) was the fourth Prime Minister of Malaysia (1981 – 2003), Dr Mahathir was Malaysia's longest serving Prime Minister and has a remarkable legacy: according to WHO (see:, for Malaysia the "probability of dying under five (per 1 000 live births)" is 6 as compared to 8 for the US (see: ).

Dr Mahathir Mohamad saying that 9-11 was not the work of Muslims (2011): “For some Americans, the deaths of nearly 3,000 people was not the scariest thing about 9/11. It was realizing who carried out the attack: yes, the American Government…The planning [for the 9/11 attacks] must have taken a considerable length of time. The candidates had to learn to fly in tiny aircrafts…. Planning to hijack four aircraft simultaneously would require great precision in timing and logistics. One aircraft maybe. But four simultaneously!! I don't think extremists from Saudi Arabia can carry out this highly sophisticated operation with such success…They [WTC buildings] came down nicely upon themselves without toppling against the other buildings close by. It looks more like planned demolition of buildings than collapse consequent upon being hit by aircraft. A third building also collapsed in the same fashion; although it was not hit by any aircraft. What is the explanation for this untouched building, which collapsed upon itself and did not damage other buildings nearby?... “[At the Pentagon] there was no debris of any kind, no broken parts of the aircraft, no black box, and no human bodies flung into the surroundings. Is it possible for an aircraft to vaporize totally after a crash?... Again [in Pennsylvania] no sign of any debris. No big crater. Did it vaporize into nothingness? Did the innocent passengers also vaporize?” [1].

[1]. Dr Mahathir Mohamad quoted in “9/11 was not work of Muslim groups: Mahathir Mohamad” , Teheran Times, 14 September 2011: .

Stephen Lendman, humanitarian US writer: "[WTC, 9-11] collapse at near free-fall speed, later proved (but unreported) by controlled demolitions"

Stephen Lendman is an outstanding anti-racist, humanitarian Jewish American analyst, writer and a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (see Stephen Lendman blog:: ) .

Stephen Lendman on controlled demolition of the WTC on 9-11 on the eve of the 10th anniversary (2011): “ A personal note. I was in a doctor's waiting room with others watching events on television. When the South Tower collapsed, everyone audibly gasped, unaware as I was how or why, let alone what lay next. When the North Tower collapsed 30 minutes later, unsettling thoughts crystallized enough to make me sense much more was involved than met the eye or what news reports claimed. It was almost anti-climactic when WTC 7 collapsed at 5:21PM. Notably, BBC's Jane Standley reported the event at 4:54PM New York time, 27 minutes in advance. Later she claimed she didn't "remember minute-by-minute what she saw," or perhaps (like BBC's management) doesn't want to explain how she could report an event before it happened without advance knowledge. Earlier in the afternoon, I smelled a rat and wrote my brother, saying: "They're drinking champagne in the White House tonight," precise words I'll never forgot. Yet they failed to imagine the horror-filled decade to come. Back then, the whole world watched the horrific spectacle, including planes hitting the towers, both bursting into flames, desperate people jumping out of windows to avoid incineration, and then collapse at near free-fall speed, later proved (but unreported) by controlled demolitions… As on previous anniversaries, they'll cover everything except what Americans most need to know - the truth.” [1].

[1]. Stephen Lendman, “Media manipulation of 9/11 truth”, MWC News, 6 September 2011: .

Stephen E. Jones, physicist: evidence for controlled demolition hypothesis for 9-11 WTC destruction

Dr Steven E. Jones is an American physicist who worked on muon-catalyzed fusion. In 2006, amid controversy surrounding his work on the collapse of the World Trade Center he was relieved of his teaching duties and placed on paid leave from Brigham Young University, retiring October 20, 2006 with the status of Professor Emeritus (see: ).

Dr Steven E. Jones on explosive demolition of the WTC: “On the basis of photographic and video evidence as well as related data and analyses, I provide thirteen reasons for ejecting the official hypothesis, according to which fore an impact damage caused the collapsed of the Twin Towers and of WTC7, in favor of the controlled demolition hypothesis…I believe this is a straightforward hypothesis, much more probable actually than the official hypothesis. It deserves thorough scientific scrutiny, beyond that which I have been able to outline in this treatise. Conclusion. I have drawn attention to glaring inadequacies in the “final” reports funded by the US Government. I have also presented multiple evidences for an alternative hypothesis. In particular, the official theory lacks repeatability in that no actual model or buildings (before or since 9-11-01) have been observed to completely collapse due to the proposed fire-based mechanisms. On the other hand, hundreds of buildings have been completely and symmetrically demolished through the use of pre-positioned explosives. And high-temperature chemical reactions can account for the observed large pools of molten metal , under both the Towers and WTC7, and the sulfidation of structural steel. The controlled demolition hypothesis cannot be dismissed as “junk science” because it better satisfies tests of repeatability and parsimony.” [1].

[1]. Dr Steven E. Jones, “Why indeed did the World Trade Center Buildings completely collapse?”, Journal of 9/11 Studies, September 2006, volume 3, 1- 48.

Leonid Ivashov, Russian Defence Chief, 9/11 done by US neocons & security services for US world dominance

General Leonid Ivashov was born in Kyrgyz SSR and graduated from Tashkent military school in 1964; he. was vice-president of the Russian Academy on geopolitical affairs, chief of the department for General affairs in the Soviet Union’s Ministry of Defense, secretary of the Council of defense ministers of the Community of independent states (CIS), chief of the Military cooperation department at the Russian federation’s Ministry of defense and Joint chief of staff of the Russian armies (see Wikipedia: ).

General Leonid Ivashov on 9/11 as a neoconservative-backed, US-linked security service false flag operation (2006): “Terrorism is the weapon used in a new type of war. At the same time, international terrorism, in complicity with the media, becomes the manager of global processes. It is precisely the symbiosis between media and terror, which allows modifying international politics and the exiting reality. In this context, if we analyze what happened on September 11, 2001, in the United States, we can arrive at the following conclusions: 1. The organizers of those attacks were the political and business circles interested in destabilizing the world order and who had the means necessary to finance the operation. The political conception of this action matured there where tensions emerged in the administration of financial and other types of resources. We have to look for the reasons of the attacks in the coincidence of interests of the big capital at global and transnational levels, in the circles that were not satisfied with the rhythm of the globalization process or its direction. Unlike traditional wars, whose conception is determined by generals and politicians, the oligarchs and politicians submitted to the former were the ones who did it this time. 2. Only secret services and their current chiefs – or those retired but still having influence inside the state organizations – have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such magnitude. Generally, secret services create, finance and control extremist organizations. Without the support of secret services, these organizations cannot exist – let alone carry out operations of such magnitude inside countries so well protected. Planning and carrying out an operation on this scale is extremely complex. 3. Osama bin Laden and “Al Qaeda” cannot be the organizers nor the performers of the September 11 attacks. They do not have the necessary organization, resources or leaders. Thus, a team of professionals had to be created and the Arab kamikazes are just extras to mask the operation. The September 11 operation modified the course of events in the world in the direction chosen by transnational mafias and international oligarchs; that is, those who hope to control the planet’s natural resources, the world information network and the financial flows. This operation also favored the US economic and political elite that also seeks world dominance.” [1].

[1].. General Leonid Ivashov, “International terrorism does not exist: September 11 attacks were the result of a set-up”, Global Research, 23 January 2006: .

Jim Hoffmann, softwar engineer: unexploded nanothermite in all WTC dust samples studied explodes "official" account of 9/11

Jim Hoffmann is a top US software engineer who has extensively analyzed the 3 World Trade Center (WTC) building demolitions (see Wikipedia: ).

Jim Hoffmann, in a layperson-directed account of the finding by scientists Dr Niels Harrit and colleagues of unexploded nanothermite high explosive in all the World Trade Center dust samples analyzed (2009): “Backers of the official account of 9/11, including NIST officials, have dismissed evidence that aluminothermics were used to destroy the World Trade Center skyscrapers, claiming that thermite's slow reaction rate makes it an unsuitable tool for demolishing buildings. Despite repeated requests by scientists and researchers to address the potential role of advanced aluminothermic composites with high explosive power, officials have refused to acknowledge such materials… The implications of the discovery of unspent aluminothermic explosives and matching residues in World Trade Center dust are staggering. There is no conceivable reason for there to have been tons of high explosives in the Towers except to demolish them, and demolition is blatantly incompatible with the official 9/11 narrative that the skyscrapers collapsed as a result of the jetliner impacts and fires. The discovery of active thermitic materials adds to a vast body of evidence that the total destruction of the Towers were controlled demolitions, and to the subset of that evidence indicating the use of aluminothermic materials to implement those demolitions… As is obvious from a review of the literature on energetic materials, thermite-based pyrotechnics can be engineered to have explosive power similar to conventional high-explosives while providing greater energy density and much greater stability. Thus, aluminothermic cutter charges similar to the shaped charges used in commercial demolitions are entirely feasible.” [1].

[1]. Jim Hoffmann, “Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust. Scientists Discover Both Residues And Unignited Fragments Of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics In Debris From the Twin Towers”, 9-11 Research, 9 December 2009: .

Alan Hart, UK ME journalist & writer: 9/11 WTC buildings down by US explosive demolition, likely Israeli involvement

Alan Hart is a former ITN and BBC Panorama correspondent who covered wars and conflicts around the world and a specialist on the Middle East. He is the author of “Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews” (see Wikipedia: and Alan Hart, “The End of Zionism?”, The Canadian Charger, 9 December 2009: ).

Alan Hart speaking the on the Kevin Barrett Show about explosive demolition of the World Trade Centre buildings 9/11, US involvement and possible Israeli involvement in 9-11 (2009): ““My guess is that at an early point they [Mossad] said to the bad guys in the CIA – hey this operation’s running what do we do, and the zionists and the neo-cons said let’s use it … The twin towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion, not the planes.” [1].

Partial transcript of Alan Hart interview with Kevin Barrett: "Hart calls the 1967 USS Liberty incident [34 US servicemen killed in cold blood by the Israelis] a war crime, and says (at 35:50 of the mp3):

The lesson of the cold-blooded attack on the Liberty was that there is nothing that the Zionist state might not do to its friends as well as its enemies to get its own way.”

In response, Kevin Barrett, the program's host, states (at 40:45 of the mp3):

“This actually lends some credibility to the people who argue that 9/11 -- whatever happened on 9/11 -- that it wasn't what we've been told. That whoever ordered the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center -- there are those who argue that Israel, its Mossad and its U.S. allies could have done it, and that it was essentially a Mossad operation. And there are others who say "that's ridiculous. How could a little country like Israel do something like that?" Well ... if you look at the Liberty incident ... it's not clear that there's really any limit to what the Israeli hawks think they can get away with in terms of attacking America.”

Hart replies:“I'm going to break a rule now. I mean, you mentioned 9/11. Basically, in public, I don't talk about it because it makes you such a target for abuse and false charges of anti-Semitism and everything, doesn't it?”

Barrett breaks in to heartily agree. Hart continues: “So basically, I've stayed away from it because it give them the focus to take the attention away from your main message. But, since you've mentioned it, I'll tell you what I honestly believe. I think it probably started out as an all Muslim operation, okay? But I think it would be very quickly penetrated by Mossad agents. I detail it in my book. From almost the moment Israel was born, it had its agents penetrating every Arab government, every Arab military organization, and every Arab terrorist group, whatever. So they certainly would have penetrated this. And at some point they said to the bad guys in the CIA, "this is running, what should we do with it?" And the neo-cons said "let's use it".

The twin towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion, not the planes. Now I'm going to tell you in passing that one of my friends is a consultant for one of the world's leading engineering firms. I'm not going to name him. They've studied the films and they've found that there's no doubt whatsoever that the planes were brought down... sorry, that the towers were brought down by controlled ground explosion. And then we have the film of the -- what is sometimes called the five dancing Israelis. Are you aware of that Kevin?”

Barrett: I certainly am. They were celebrating the attacks. They had set up to film before the attacks and they were high-fiving and flicking cigarette lighters in front of the twin towers.

Hart: “That's right. But the point is that they all had mobile phones. Right?”

Barrett: Right.

Hart: “Now they were initially reported as being Muslims. Are you aware of that?”

Barrett: Um... Middle-easterners.

Hart: “Alright, middle-easterners. But the impression was that they were Muslims -- they were the bad guys.”

Barrett: Right.

Hart: “So the FBI gave chase, and these five guys, they tried to avoid being arrested. But they were eventually caught, and they were arrested. And guess what. They were all Mossad agents.”

Barrett: That was confirmed by the Forward.

Hart: “That's right. It's established fact. It suggests that they knew that it was going to happen. It was possible, and this is Alan Hart speaking, that the planes were fitted with transponders, and these guys were calling in the planes to the targets. It's not impossible.”

Barrett: I suppose not. These are many possibilities, but the possibility of remotely-guided planes is a good one, being that, if one had planned a very complex demolition of three skyscrapers which would have been the three largest buildings taken down in history by controlled demolition, one would have to make sure that they were hit in order to justify that.

Hart: “And isn't it the case, Kevin, that quite a lot of your top pilots have said that it would have been a bloody difficult job to drive those planes into those buildings.”

Barrett: Well, that's right. I've had a number of pilots who are members of Pilots for 9/11 Truth come on my show, and they said that the clocked speed of the aircraft, when it hit the South Tower, was nearly 600 miles per hour at sea level. And that's a speed that, well, some of them say that these 767 aircraft couldn't possibly reach that speed at ground level. They would be torn apart at substantially lower speeds than that by the air pressure of the much thicker air at sea level. But, in any case, that nobody in their right mind could claim that it would be possible to guide a plane at that speed at sea level and hit those targets in the way they were hit.

Hart: “So the speculation is that were fitted with some kind of transponder and they were called to the target electronically is not totally irrational?”

Barrett: Uh... well no it's not, and in fact, it's even somewhat questionable whether normal passenger aircraft would be able to do that consistently at that kind of speed. In any case, it seems very doubtful that pilots who couldn't even solo in a Cessna would be performing these amazing stunts to hit their targets.

Hart: “Well, that and two other things Kevin. We know as a fact that at least six and maybe nine of the alleged hijackers who died are in fact alive and living in...”

Barrett (interrupting): Well, that's right. And that's confirmed in Jay Kolar's article "What we now know about the 9/11 hijackers", which was published, actually, in a volume by Europe's top scholarly outfit (inaudible). It's amazing that the scholarly literature is all so one-sided. There's no scholarly counter-literature except for...

Hart: “Except for "how dare you be so anti-Semitic". That's the only counter-literature.”

Barrett: Right, right. And then there's Cass Sunstein's counter-literature published in the Harvard Law Review. He's that Harvard guy who's advising Obama...

[1]. Alan Hart, interviewed on the Kevin Barrett Show, 9/11Truth, Norcal, 16 July 2010: .

[2]. Adam Holland, “ Alan Hart: Israel did 9/11 and may nuke the U.S.”, partial transcript of Alan Hart interview with Kevin Barrett, Adam Holland, 27 May 2010: .

Niels Harrit, Danish scientist & colleagues: unreacted nanothermite high explosive in all WTC dust samples studied

Professor Niels Harrit, is an associate professor of chemistry in the Department of Chemistry at the prestigious 9-Nobel-Laureate University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (see ).

Professor Niels Harrit and colleagues in a scientific paper in a peer-reviewed journal re discovery of unexploded nanothermite in all World Trade Center (WTC) dust samples studied (2009): “We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic… having observed unignited thermitic material in the WTC residue, we suggest that other energetic materials suitable for cutter charges or explosives should also be looked for in the WTC dust. NIST [National Institute of Standards and Technology] has admitted that they have not yet looked for such residues… Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnolgy, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material. [1].

Professor Niels Harrit on the collapse of building WTC7 (limited damage, no extensive fires) (2007): “We are not talking about conspiracy theories, absolutely not. We are talking about elementary physics and chemical processes, Newton's laws, gravity, the melting point of steel, and the like… WTC7 did not. After the building had smouldered for seven hours, it collapsed, perfectly symmetrically. It was quite literally levelled, and ended up as a pile that was basically confined to its footprint. The process took 6.4 seconds, which is equivalent to "free fall". If you had stood on the 47th floor and thrown an apple out the window at the exact moment the collapse began, your apple would have hit the ground at the same time as the roof. How could it happen? In the hours following the airplane strikes on the two towers, a global myth began to spread that the World Trade Centre collapsed due to fire and mechanical damage. The only problem is that no steel structure has ever before collapsed due to fire, it is historically unprecedented. Over 400 cases of fire in that type of skyscraper are known prior to 2001, and none have collapsed. Not one. … Two official explanations of the events in Manhattan on 11 September have been put forward by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST). In the final FEMA report, WTC7 is hardly mentioned. They note that there were fires in the building, but do not attempt to explain the collapse. NIST actually took the sensible step of engaging a company to construct models of the steel structure in the two towers. The models were then exposed to fires and damage. Even though temperatures were used which were significantly higher than what could have resulted from the attack, they were unable to provoke a collapse. The models remained standing. NIST chose, however, to ignore this result… The attack on the World Trade Center was a tragedy for the people in the towers and in the airplanes, and a tragedy for their families. It also marked the beginning of the tragic war on terror. The current trends in Western society towards greater surveillance and the loss of civil rights can also only be called tragic. If we have also been lied to, the tragedy is complete. How did WTC7 collapse? We are not asking 'why'. This is no conspiracy theory. There is no burden of proof on us. Some extremely simple observations have been made, and we want to hear an official explanation that is consistent with elementary physics and chemistry, and common sense. If you want to investigate the conditions described above, you won't find anything in the media. But Google something like 'WTC7' and you will find a flood of information. There are tens of thousands of people who have a feeling something is wrong. But there is not a word about it in the media.” [2].

[1]. Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, The Open Chemical Physics Journals, vol.2, pp.7-31 (25), 2009: .

[2]. Niels Harrit, “The seventh tower”, (a translation of a feature article printed in the Danish newspaper Information on 31 March 2007) : .

US scholar Professor David Ray Griffin exposes the official story of 9-11 as a Big Lie

Professor David Ray Griffin is a US philosopher of religion and theology, pioneered process theology and has exposed the lie of the “official version” of 9/11 lie in numerous books, articles, and lectures (see: ).

Professor David Ray Griffin (2006): "It would seem, for many reasons, that the official story of 9/11, which has served as a religious Myth in the intervening years (and still does), is a myth in the pejorative sense of a story that does not correspond to reality." [1].

[1]. David Griffin in an April 5, 2006 lecture titled, "9/11: The Myth and the Reality," , quoted by Stephen Lendman, “9-11 mythology: the big lie of our time”, MWC News, 9 September 2011: .

Richard Gage, AE911Truth founder, wants proper investigation of 9-11 WTC explosive demolition hypothesis

Richard Gage is an important member of the 9/11 Truth movement and the founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) which demands proper investigation of the explosive demolition of WTC based on the evidence for the "free fall" pace of the collapse of the buildings, the "lateral ejection of steel", and the "mid-air pulverization of concrete" (see: and ).

AE911Truth founder Richard Gage (2010): "The people of New York need to see the light--that a third WTC skyscraper not hit by any plane was destroyed on September 11th. They have been deceived about what happened on that terrible day. We are shining the spotlight, literally, on the fact that the official story of what happened at Ground Zero simply cannot be true and that a truly independent new investigation is needed both as a matter of national security and as the key to justice for the victims of the Twin Towers." [1].

[1]. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth): .

Hereward Fenton, Australian 9/11 truther: "Why I became a September 11 truther"

Hereward Fenton is a researcher in the 9/11 truth movement in Australia, a senior computer programmer and has a BA in anthropology and religious studies. He is editor and webmaster of (see: ).

Hereward Fenton on why he became a 9/11 truther (2011): “The central argument of the movement is that 9/11 was a staged, false flag operation designed to propel the US and its allies into war for the sake of profit, oil and empire… let’s agree on what we can agree on:

• Planes were flown into the twin towers.
• Towers 1, 2 and 7 collapsed, symmetrically, at close to free fall, pulverising most of the concrete of those buildings into a fine dust which covered Manhattan.
• The Pentagon was hit by a third plane.
• A fourth plane crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
• Around 3,000 people died as a direct result of the attacks.

We can all agree with the mainstream account up to this point… It is when we consider the “why”, the “how” and the “who” of these events that I and many others radically depart from the mainstream narrative of 9/11… In regard to the “how” questions, the only topic I will address in this piece is the collapse of the towers. All three collapsed at close to free fall, including Building 7, which was not even hit by a plane. There are numerous testimonies from first responders who saw heard and felt explosions before the buildings went down. The free fall rate of collapse is strong proof that explosives were used, and there is no alternative to this conclusion that is consistent with the laws of physics.” [1].

[1]. Hereward Fenton, “Why I became a September 11 truther”, The Punch, 11 September 2011: .

Richard Falk, Emeritus Professor of International Law, Princeton University, demands proper inquiry into 9-11

Professor Richard Falk is an outstanding Jewish American scholar: emeritus professor in international law at Princeton University, writer, the author or co-author of 20 books ) speaker, activist on world affairs, and an appointee to2 UN positions on the Occupied Palestinian Territories (for detailed biography see Wikipedia: ). In 2008 this eminent Jewish international law scholar was arrested, imprisoned and deported by Apartheid Israel when he attempted to fulfil his role as UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

Professor Richard Falk demands proper inquiry on 9-11 (2008): “Every so often attention is called anew to the doubts surrounding the true character of the events surrounding the 9/11 attacks. Recently, the report of the collapse of Building 7 represented such an occasion. Any close student of 9/11 is aware of the many serious discrepancies between the official version of what took place and the actual happenings on that fateful day in 2001. David Ray Griffin and others have analyzed and assessed these discrepancies in such an objective and compelling fashion that only wilful ignorance can maintain that the 9/11 narrative should be treated as a closed book, and that the public should move on to address the problems of the day.

To accept such a view is to acquiesce in what can be described at best as governmental evasiveness and irresponsibility, a resolve to leave the discrepancies unexplained. It is not paranoid under such circumstances to assume that the established elites of the American governmental structure have something to hide, and much to explain. What has not been established by the “9/11 Truth Movement” is a convincing counter-narrative – that is, an alternate version of the events that clears up to what degree, if at all, the attacks resulted from incompetence, deliberate inaction, and outright complicity.

For democratic government to work, citizens must never refrain from seeking answers to the most difficult questions. Here, what is at stake is enormous. It is not only the memory of those killed and deprived by the attacks, but also the fashioning of a climate of opinion that gave rise to international wars, as well as led to widespread denial of rights under the pretext of “homeland security” and counter-terrorism. There is also a profound challenge to the legitimacy of a governing process that stands accused of letting such crimes take place, if not aiding and abetting their commission and subsequent cover-up.

It might be asked whether it is not just an expression of morbid curiosity for non-Americans to harp on this issue of finding out the truth about what happened on 9/11. My response is that what takes place in the United States often has global reverberations, and never more so than in this instance. The US is the first truly global state in history, with its military presence established worldwide by more than 700 overseas bases, by navies in every ocean, and by the military domination of space.

The brighter side of US influence was revealed recently by the sense of peoples around the world that the election of Barack Obama as the new American president was a global event, and not just a national election. But what should be obvious is that the 9/11 experience has been relied upon to wage bloody wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and to underwrite a disastrously conceived “war on terror” that should be concern of everyone on the planet.

From this perspective, and given the dark cloud of doubt that lingers over the official 9/11 narrative, why was the issue not even discussed during the many months of presidential campaigning? As far as I know it was never mentioned. And the explanation is not the urgency associated with the widening economic crisis or the tactical interest of the Democrats to avoid offending Republicans in their search for support across party lines. The truth is deeper, and far more disturbing.

As far as I can tell, the real explanation is a widely shared fear of what sinister forces might lay beneath the unturned stones of a full and honest investigation of 9/11. Ever since the assassinations in the 1960s of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Malcolm X there has been waged a powerful campaign against “conspiracy theory” that has made anyone who dares question the official story to be branded as a kook or some kind of unhinged troublemaker. In this climate of opinion, any political candidate for high office who dared raise doubts about the official version of 9/11 would immediately be branded as unfit, and would lose all political credibility. It is impossible to compete in any public arena in the United States if a person comes across as a “9/11 doubter.”

A few talk show hosts, investigative citizens, and publishers have kept a low flame of controversy burning sufficiently to sustain a large and growing grassroots constituency that shares the view that the truth about the 9/11 events is not yet known, or more radically, that the truth is known but being actively suppressed. These doubters are determined to continue their difficult quest for truth, and this could possibly result in disclosures at some point that are sufficiently dramatic to force the issue onto the public stage – where it belongs.

The persisting inability to resolve this fundamental controversy about 9/11 subtly taints the legitimacy of the American government. It can only be removed by a willingness, however belated, to reconstruct the truth of that day, and to reveal the story behind its prolonged suppression. What exactly that truth would be is certainly unknowable at present, and even an honest, collaborative effort might never altogether remove doubts. But that honest effort is just what should be demanded and expected by persons of good will everywhere.” [1].

[1]. Richard Falk quoted in “US condemns 9/11 truth crusader, Richard Falk”, Indian Muslim Observer, 27 January 2011: .

Jeff Dahlstrom, former USAF pilot: 9/11 US treason, premeditated false flag military operation

Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom, former U.S. Air Force pilot (see: ) .

Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom summation of what may well have happened on 9/11 and why it happened: “The US government and the news media, once again, were lying to the world about the real terrorists and the public murder of 2,972 innocents on 9/11. The ‘Patriot Act’ was actually written prior to 9/11 with the intention of destroying the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. It was passed by Congress, based upon the government's myth of 9/11, which was in reality a staged hoax. 9/11 was scripted and executed by rogue elements of the military, FAA, intelligence, and private contractors working for the US government. In addition to severely curtailing fundamental rights of Americans, the 9/11 crime was then used by this administration, the one I originally voted for and supported, to justify waging two preemptive wars (and most likely a third war), killing over 4,500 American soldiers, and killing over one million innocent Afghan and Iraqi people. It was all premeditated. Treason, a false flag military operation, and betrayal of the trust of the American people were committed on 9/11 by the highest levels of the US government and not one person responsible for the crimes, or the cover-up, has been held accountable for the last six years."

[1]. Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom, quoted in “USA military officers challenge official account of September 11”, Axis of Logic, 29 May 2008 (ex Pakistan Daily) : .

Francesco Cossiga, former Italian President: US CIA & Israeli Mossad did 9/11 for US & Zionist hegemony

Professor Francesco Cossiga was the 63rd prime minister and 8th president of Italy, professor of law at the University of Sassari, Sardinia, and intelligence intimate. He has been a lifetime senator, like all the former Presidents of the Italian Republic, since 1992. His current title is President Emeritus of the Italian Republic (see Wikipedia: )

Professor Francesco Cossiga in a famous interview with leading Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera re US CIA and Israeli Mossad involvement in 9/11 (2007): "As I’ve been told, tomorrow or the day after tomorrow [interview appeared on 30 November 2007] the most important chain of newspapers of our country should give the proof, with an exceptional scoop, that the video (which in reality is an audio tape, NdR) in which appears Osama, leader of “the great and powerful movement of islamic revenge Al Quaeda” - God bless him! - and in which are formulated threats to our ex president Berlusconi, is nothing more than a fake realized inside Mediaset studios [the huge television group owned by Berlusconi] in Milan and sent to arabic television station Al Jazeera. The trap was organized to create solidarity for Berlusconi, who is having lot of problems related to the tangle between RAI and Mediaset. From circles around Palazzo Chigi, nerve centre of direction of Italian intelligence, it is noted that the non-authenticity of the video is testified from the fact that Osama bin Laden in it 'confessed' that Al Qaeda was the author of the attack of the 11 September on the Twin Towers in New York, while all of the democratic circles of America and of Europe, in the front lines being those of the Italian centre-left, now know well that the disastrous attack was planned and realized by the American CIA and Mossad with the help of the Zionist world to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and to persuade the Western powers to intervene in Iraq and Afghanistan." [1].

[1]. Francesco Cossiga, quoted in :”Francesco Cossiga”, Wikipedia: .

Noam Chomsky, outstanding Jewish-American MIT scholar: no evidence that Al Qaeda did 9/11

Avram Noam Chomsky (born December 7, 1928) is an outstanding Jewish American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, political activist and an Institute Professor and professor emeritus of linguistics at the 76-Nobel-Laureate Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Chomsky is regarded by scholars as one of the fathers of modern linguistics. Chomsky has been very forthright in his opposition to US imperialist wars and Israeli human rights abuses (see: ).

Professor Noam Chomsky on Press TV's program a Simple Question saying US invasion of Afghanistan was illegal since to date there is no evidence that al-Qaeda has carried out the 9/11 attacks: “The explicit and declared motive of the [Afghanistan] war was to compel the Taliban to turn over to the United States, the people who they accused of having been involved in World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist acts. The Taliban…they requested evidence…and the Bush administration refused to provide any…We later discovered one of the reasons why they did not bring evidence: they did not have any…8 months later the head of FBI, after the most intense international investigation in history, informed the press that the FBI believed that the plot may have been hatched in Afghanistan, but was probably implemented in the United Arab Emirates and Germany… three weeks later a British officer … announced that the US and Britain would continue bombing, until the people of Afghanistan overthrew the Taliban... That was later turned into the official justification for the war…All of this was totally illegal. What’s more it was criminal." [1].

[1]. Professor Noam Chomsky in interview on Press TV “A Simple Question”, Press TV, “” Chomsky: US-led Afghan War, criminal”, Information Clearing House, 3 November 2010: .

Kevin Bracken, Australian union official, disputes "Official US version" of 9-11

Kevin Bracken is the secretary of the Victorian Branch of the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) (see: ) and is the President of the Victorian Trades Hall Council (see: ) .

Kevin Bracken excited controversy when he phoned an ABC Radio National program hosted by Jon Faine and expressed disquiet over the “official” 9-11 story: “"I believe the official story is a conspiracy theory that doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny. In my mind the buildings were imploded. I challenge you to a public debate. Aviation fuel doesn't get hot enough to melt steel and no high rise steel frame building before or after September 11 has ever collapsed due to fire. I stick to scientific fact." Jon Faine described the claim as a "nutter theory" (see Shannon Deery, “Trades Hall president calls 9/11 “conspiracy”, Herald Sun, October 20, 2010: ).

Pro-US, pro-Zionist and pro-war Australian Labor PM Julia Gillard responded thus about Kevin Bracken’s comments in Parliament when pro-US, pro-Zionist and pro-war Opposition MPs Josh Frydenberg and Christopher Pyne asked her to take disciplinary action against Kevin Bracken: "Obviously I don’t agree with the remarks, obviously they are stupid and wrong. The Labor Party is a large organisation, people join it as individuals – we don’t dictate what people think... However, can I also say this: if it is in the intention of the Leader of the Opposition to expel every individual from the Liberal Party who makes a stupid statement, I'll start sending him a weekly list." (see Samantha Donovan and staff, “Unionist’s 9/11 comments “stupid and wrong”: Gillard”. ” ABC News, 20 October, 2010: )

MUA national secretary Paddy Crumlin: "in no way does he [Kevin Bracken] represent the views of the MUA. There may be people in the MUA or elsewhere who also believe that no one went to the moon either.” (see Ewin Hannan, “Union, Gillard reject “stupid” 9/11 theory”” The Australian, 21 October 21, 2010: ).

Victorian Trades Hall secretary Brian Boyd: “The official Trades Hall position is not to entertain that theory. We had almost 3000 working people killed in that terrorist attack. It was a terrorist attack, and we condemn it. He is welcome to his views and we've discussed his theories. But I totally disagree. 99 per cent of the time Kevin's a very good president.” (see Shannon Deery, “Trades Hall president calls 9/11 “conspiracy”, Herald Sun, October 20, 2010: ).

Victorian Attorney General Rob Hulls quoted by the Herald Sun: “”Attorney General Rob Hulls said “loopy” conspiracy theories “verge on the delusional” and Mr Bracken must be reprimanded. “He probably also belives that Elvuis Presley is alive and working at his local 7-Eleven”, Mr Hulls said. “And knows who shot at [former Victorian premier] Jeff Kennett? This is loopy stuff.” (Herald Sun, 21 October 2010, p9).

Federal Opposition Victorian MP Josh Frydenberg asked PM Gillard in Parliament what action she would take against Mr Bracken “to send a message that such remarks are unacceptable” ( Shannon Deery, Stephen McMahon, “Trades Hall President stands by his 9/11 conspiracy”, Herald Sun, 21 October 2010: ).

Victorian Shadow Attorney General Robert Clarke re Kevin Bracken 's comments and Australian soldiers serving in Afghanistan: "It strikes at the very heart of the West's struggle against terrorism and it is a disgrace that while Australian soldiers are serving and dying in Afghanistan that Mr Bracken make these wild claims that undermine the very reason for their presence in Afghanistan...The Trades Hall Council needs to consider Mr Bracken's future as its president and the MUA needs to consider his future as their secretary. These comments can't stand they need to be condemned in the strongest possible terms'' ( Shannon Deery, Stephen McMahon, “Trades Hall President stands by his 9/11 conspiracy”, Herald Sun, 21 October 2010: ).

As of 1600 23 October 2020, 73% of respondents said "Yes" to the Herald Sun question "Do you think Kevin Bracken's comments were reasonable?" ( Shannon Deery, Stephen McMahon, “Trades Hall President stands by his 9/11 conspiracy”, Herald Sun, 21 October 2010: ).

Kevin Bracken "has renewed his call for a fresh inquiry into the [9/11] attacks" (The Australian, 21 October 2010, p3).

Dr Gideon Polya sent the following letter to media, MPs and others on Saturday 23 October 2010 in support of rational risk management and Kevin Bracken's comments:

"Australian union official Kevin Bracken has courageously stated that the “official US conspiracy theory” about 9-11 does not stand up to scientific scrutiny and has demanded a proper inquiry. A 5-decade career scientist, I object to the false and offensive abuse directed at Kevin Bracken and endorse his concerns about the “official version” of successive, egregiously violent and dishonest US Administrations and his call for a proper investigation.

Many scientific and intelligence experts dispute the “official US version” and indeed assert that the US was complicit in the 9-11 atrocity (for details Google “Experts: US did 9-11” and “Scholars for 9-11 Truth”).

Whether industrial safety issues or mass mortality occurrences such as the 9-11 atrocity, there is a common requirement for rational risk management that successively involves (a) accurate data, (b) scientific analysis and (c) systemic change to minimize risk. However re 9-11 there have been (a) lies, intimidation and censorship, (b) anti-science spin and (c) unsubstantiated blaming, terror hysteria and wars associated so far with 8 million avoidable deaths (2.5 million Iraqi, 4.9 million Afghan and 0.8 million opiate drug-related deaths - 3,000 Australian, 100,000 American - linked to US Alliance restoration of the Taliban-destroyed Afghan opium industry).

PS. See “Experts: US did 9-11”: and “Scholars for 9-11 truth”: ."

Kevin Bracken on 9/11 (2006): “If they want to stop terrorism they've got to look at who was really behind September 11. It couldn't have happened unless there was participation from key elements of the American military and government and security services. I am not saying the whole lot were involved. But I believe the official story for September 11 doesn't stack up." [1].

Kevin Bracken on 9/11 to Jon Faine (ABC) (2010): “"I believe the official story is a conspiracy theory that doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny. In my mind the buildings were imploded. I challenge you to a public debate. Aviation fuel doesn't get hot enough to melt steel and no high rise steel frame building before or after September 11 has ever collapsed due to fire. I stick to scientific fact..” [1].

Kevin Bracken responding to abuse from Jon Faine on ABC (2010): “Unfortunately cowards like yourself have set the political agenda in this country for too long. I won't be cowered down to bullies like yourself.” [2].

[1]. Kevin Bracken quoted by Shannon Deery, “Trades Hall president calls 9/11 “conspiracy”, Herald Sun, October 20, 2010: .

[2]. Shannon Deery, Stephen McMahon, “Trades Hall President stands by his 9/11 conspiracy”, Herald Sun, 21 October 2010: .

USAF Lt Col Bowman: 9/11 failure & US Government cover-up over who was responsible

Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret); doctoral degrees in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering; former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter; served as the Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. He also flew over 100 combat missions in Viet Nam as a fighter pilot (see: ).

Lt. Col. Robert Bowman on 9/11: “There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible. Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney…. [re failure of NORAD to intercept the four hijacked planes on 9/11} Col. Bowman I'm an old interceptor pilot. I know the drill. I've done it. I know how long it takes. I know the rules. Critics of the government story on 9/11 have said: “Well, they knew about this, and they did nothing”. That's not true. If our government had done nothing that day and let normal procedure be followed, those planes, wherever they were, would have been intercepted, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive.” [1].

[1]. Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, quoted in “USA military officers challenge official account of September 11”, Axis of Logic, 29 May 2008 (ex Pakistan Daily) : .

Christopher Bollyn: US and Israeli complicity in 9-11 atrocity

Christopher Bollyn is a US writer who has written extensively about US and Israeli involvement in the 9-11 atrocity (see: ).

Thus, for example, Christopher Bolleyn, "The Israeli connection to 9-11": :

“U.S. investigators and the controlled media have ignored a preponderance of evidence pointing to Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad, being involved in the terror attacks of 9-11”.

ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH demand proper investigation of WTC explosive demolition hypothesis

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth): “Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) is a non-profit corporation. We are a non-partisan association of architects, engineers and affiliates dedicated to exposing the falsehoods and to revealing truths about the “collapses” of the 3 World Trade Center high-rises on September 11, 2001… Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth focuses solely on the forensic evidence available to prove that the three World Trade Center buildings were demolished as a means of proving to Congress that a new and independent investigation is warranted.We also want to explain the evidence to the public at large. We believe that turning the tide of public opinion is the most powerful way to convince Congress to pursue a new investigation” (see: and ).

AE911Truth founder Richard Gage (2010): "The people of New York need to see the light--that a third WTC skyscraper not hit by any plane was destroyed on September 11th. They have been deceived about what happened on that terrible day. We are shining the spotlight, literally, on the fact that the official story of what happened at Ground Zero simply cannot be true and that a truly independent new investigation is needed both as a matter of national security and as the key to justice for the victims of the Twin Towers." [1].

[1]. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth): .

Dr Elias Akleh: US and Israel did 9-11 for WW3 Global War on Terror

Dr Elias Akleh is an Arab writer of Palestinian descent, born in the town of Beit-Jala, who currently he lives in the US (see: ).

Dr Elias Akleh on US and Israeli complicity in the 9-11 atrocity (2010): “The terrorist attack of 9/11 had been used to launch WWIII called “Global war on terror”. The American administration had enlisted world political bodies such as UN, EU, and NATO to wage wars in different kinds of shapes and intensity against other countries; Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Syria and Iran… Scientific studies and many investigations done by 911 truth groups have discredited the investigation of the 911 Commission. There are a lot of evidences indicating that 911 was a false flag terrorist attack planned by the power elite and executed with the cooperation of Israeli Mossad operatives (the dancing Israelis documenting the attack).” [1].

[1]. Elias Akleh, “The Power Elite, and Al-Qaeda”, MWC News, 15 September 2010: .

Ahmadinejad: "majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians" think that US did 9-11

According to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: "majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians" think that US did 9-11.

Here is the full text of Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's speech to the 65th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, New York, September 2010 (see Iranian UN Mission: and ). The key parts are in bold.

"Mr. President,


Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am grateful to the Almighty God who granted me the opportunity to appear

before this world assembly once again. I wish to begin by commemorating those who

lost their lives in the horrible flood in Pakistan and express my heartfelt sympathy

with the families who lost their loved ones as well as with the people and the

government of Pakistan. I urge everyone to assist their fellow men and women as a

humane duty.

Let me thank H.E. Mr. Ali Abdussalam Treki, the President of the he sixtyfourth

session of the United Nations General Assembly, for all his efforts during his

tenure. I also would like to congratulate H.E. Mr. Joseph Deiss, the President of the

sixty-fifth session of the United Nations General Assembly and wish him all success.

In the past years, I spoke to you about some of the hopes and concerns,

including family crises, security, human dignity, world economy, climate change as

well as the aspiration for justice and lasting peace.

After about one hundred years of domination, the system of Capitalism and the

existing world order has proved to be unable to provide appropriate solution to the

problems of societies, thus coming to an end. I shall try to examine the two main

causes of this failure and picture some features of the ideal future order.

A) Attitudes and Beliefs

As you are well aware, the divine prophets had the mission to call everyone to

monotheism, love and justice and show mankind the path to prosperity. They invite

men to contemplation and knowledge in order to better appreciate the truth and to

avoid atheism and egoism. The very nature of the message of all prophets is one and

the same. Every messenger endorsed the messenger before him and gave glad tidings

about the prophet to come, and presented a more complete version of the religion in

accordance with the capacity of the man at the time. This continued up to the last

messenger of God who presented the perfect and all inclusive religion.

In opposition to that, the egotist and the greedy stood up against this clear call,

revolting against the message.

Nimrod countered Hazrat Abraham, Pharaoh countered Hazrat Moses and the

greedy countered Hazrat Jesus Christ and Hazrat Mohammad (Peace be upon them

all). In the recent centuries, the human ethics and values have been rejected as a cause

for backwardness. They were even portrayed as opposing wisdom and science

because of the earlier infliction on man by the proclaimers of religion in the dark ages

of the West

Man’s disconnection from Heaven detached him from his true self.

Man with his potentials for understanding the secrets of the universe, his instinct

for seeking truth, his aspirations for justice and perfection, his quest for beauty and

purity and his capacity to represent God on earth was reduced to a creature limited to

the materialistic world with a mission to maximize individualistic pleasures. Human

instinct, then, replaced true human nature.

Human beings and nations were considered rivals and the happiness of an

individual or a nation was defined in collision with, and elimination or suppression of

others. Constructive evolutionary cooperation was replaced with a destructive struggle

for survival.

The lust for capital and domination replaced monotheism which is the gate to love

and unity.

This widespread clash of the egoist with the divine values gave way to slavery and

colonialism. A large portion of the world came under the domination of a few western

States. Tens of millions of people were taken to slavery and tens of millions of

families were shattered as a result. All the resources, the rights and the cultures of the

colonized nations were plundered. Lands were occupied and the indigenous people

were humiliated and mass- murdered.

Yet, nations rose up, colonialism was alienated and the independence of the nations

was recognized. Thus, the hope for respect, prosperity and security was revived

amongst nations. In the beginning of the past century nice talks about freedom,

human rights and democracy created hopes for healing the deep wounds of the past.

Today, however, not only those dreams are not realized, but memories, even at times

worse than before, have been recorded.

As a result of the two World Wars, the occupation of Palestine, the Korean and the

Vietnam’s Wars, the Iraqi war against Iran, the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq as

well as many wars in Africa, hundreds of millions of people were killed, wounded or


Terrorism, illicit drugs, poverty and the social gaps increased. The dictatorial and

coup d’etat governments in Latin America committed unprecedented crimes with the

support of the West.

Instead of disarmament, the proliferation and stockpiling of nuclear, biological and

chemical weapons expanded, putting the world under a bigger threat. As a result, the

very same old goals of colonialists and the slave masters were, this time round,

pursued with a new facade.

B) The Global Management and Ruling Structures

The League of Nations and, then, the United Nations were established with the

promise to bring about peace, security and the realization of human rights, which in

fact meant a global management.

One can analyze the current governance of the world by examining three events:

First, the event of the II September 2001 which has affected the whole world for

almost a decade.

All of a sudden, the news of the attack on the twin towers was broadcast using

numerous footages of the incident.

Almost all governments and known figures strongly condemned this incident.

But then a propaganda machine came into full force; it was implied that the whole

world was exposed to a huge danger, namely terrorism, and that the only way to save

the world would be to deploy forces into Afghanistan.

Eventually Afghanistan, and shortly thereafter Iraq were occupied.

Please take note:

It was said that some three thousands people were killed on the II September for

which we are all very saddened. Yet, up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq hundreds

of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced and the

conflict is still going on and expanding.

In identifying those responsible for the attack, there were three viewpoints.

1- That a very powerful and complex terrorist group, able to successfully cross

all layers of the American intelligence and security, carried out the attack.

This is the main viewpoint advocated by American statesmen.

2- That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to

reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order

also to save the Zionist regime.

The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree

with this view.

3- It was carried out by a terrorist group but the American government supported

and took advantage of the situation. Apparently, this viewpoint has fewer proponents.

The main evidence linking the incident was a few passports found in the huge

volume of rubble and a video of an individual whose place of domicile was unknown

but it was announced that he had been involved in oil deals with some American

officials. It was also covered up and said that due to the explosion and fire no trace of

the suicide attackers was found.

There remain, however, a few questions 10 be answered:

1- Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have

been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved

in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?

2- Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a

classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds

of thousands of people to counter a terrorist group?

3- Was it not possible to act the way Iran countered the Riggi terrorist group who

killed and wounded 400 innocent people in Iran. In the Iranian operation no innocent

person was hurt.

It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for

the event of the II September so that in the future expressing views about it is not


I wish to announce here that next year the Islamic Republic of Iran will host a

conference to study terrorism and the means to confront it. I invite officials, scholars,

thinkers, researchers and research institutes of all countries to attend this conference.

Second, is the occupation of the Palestinian territories

The oppressed people of Palestine have lived under the rule of an occupying

regime for 60 years, been deprived of freedom, security and the right to selfdetermination,

while the occupiers are given recognition. On a daily basis, the houses

are being destroyed over the heads of innocent women and children. People are

deprived of water, food and medicine in their own homeland. The Zionists have

imposed five all-out wars on the neighboring countries and on the Palestinian people.

The Zionists committed the most horrible crimes against the defenseless people in

the wars against Lebanon and Gaza.

The Zionist regime attacked a humanitarian flotilla in a blatant defiance of all

international norms and kills the civilians.

This regime which enjoys the absolute support of some western countries regularly

threatens the countries in the region and continues publicly announced assassination

of Palestinian figures and others, while Palestinian defenders and those opposing this

regime are pressured, labeled as terrorists and anti Semites. All values, even the

freedom of expression, in Europe and in the United States are being sacrificed at the

altar of Zionism.

Solutions are doomed to fail because the right of the Palestinian people is not taken

into account.

Would we have witnessed such horrendous crimes if instead of recognizing the

occupation, the sovereign right of the Palestinian people had been recognized?

Our unambiguous proposition is the return of the Palestinian refugees to their home

land and the reference to the vote of the people of Palestine to exercise their

sovereignty and decide on the type of governance.

Third, is the nuclear energy

Nuclear energy is clean and cheap and a heavenly gift which is amongst the most

suitable alternatives to cut the pollutions emanating from fossil fuels.

The Non- Proliferation Treaty (NPT) allows all member States to use nuclear

energy without limits and the International Atomic Energy Agency is mandated to

provide member States with technical and legal support.

The nuclear bomb is the worst inhumane weapon and which must totally be

eliminated. The NPT prohibits its development and stockpiling and calls for nuclear


Nonetheless, note what some of the permanent members of the Security Council

and nuclear bomb holders have done:

They have equated nuclear energy with the nuclear bomb, and have distanced this

energy from the reach of most of nations by establishing monopolies and pressuring

the IAEA. While at the same time, they have continued to maintain, expand and

upgrade their own nuclear arsenals.

This has entailed the following:

Not only the nuclear disarmament has not been realized but also nuclear bombs

have been proliferated in some regions, including by the occupying and intimidating

Zionist regime.

I would like here to propose that the year 20 II be proclaimed the year of nuclear

disarmament and “Nuclear Energy for all, Nuclear Weapons for None”.

In all these cases the United Nations has been unable to take any effective course

of action. Unfortunately, in the decade proclaimed as the “International Decade for the

Culture of Peace” hundreds of thousands were killed and injured as a result of war,

aggression and occupation, and hostilities and antagonism increased.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Very recently the world witnessed the ugly and inhumane act of burning the Holy


The Holy Quran is the Divine Book and the eternal miracle of the Prophet oflslam.

It calls for worshipping the One God, justice, compassion toward people,

development and progress, reflection and thinking, defending the oppressed and

resisting against the oppressors; and it names with respect the previous Messengers of

God, like Noah, Abraham, Isaaq, Joseph, Moses and Jesus Christ (Peace be Upon

them all) and endorses them.. They burned Quran to bum all these truths and good

judgments. However, the truth could not be burned. Quran is eternal because God and

truth are everlasting. This act and any other act which widens the gap and distances

between nations is evil. We should wisely avoid playing into the hands of Satan. On

behalf of the Iranian nation I pay respect to all Divine Books and their followers. This

is the Quran and this is the Bible. I pay respect to both of them.

Esteemed Friends,

For years the inefficiency of the capitalism and the existing world management and

structures has been exposed and the majority of States and nations have been on a

quest for fundamental changes and for the prevalence ofjustice in global relations.

The cause of the United Nation’s ineptitude is in its unjust structure. Major power

is monopolized in the Security Council due to the veto privilege, and the main pillar

of the Organization, namely the General Assembly, is marginalized.

In the past several decades, at least one of the permanent members of the Security

Council has always been a party to the disputes.

The veto advantage grants impunity to aggression and occupation; How could,

therefore, one expect competence while both the judge and the prosecutor are a party

to the dispute?

Had Iran enjoyed veto privilege, would the Security Council and the IAEA

Director General have taken the same position in the nuclear issue?

Dear Friends,

The United Nations is the key center for coordinating the common global

management. Its structure needs to be reformed in a manner that all independent

States and nations be able to participate in the global governance actively and


The veto privilege should be revoked and the General Assembly should be the

highest body and the Secretary-General should be the most independent official and

all his positions and activities should be taken with the approval of the General

Assembly and should be directed towards promoting justice and eliminating


The Secretary-General should not come under pressure from powers and/or the

country hosting the Organization for his stating the truth and administration ofjustice.

It is suggested that the General Assembly should, within one year and in the

framework of an extraordinary session, finalize the reformation of the Organization’s


The Islamic Republic of Iran has clear suggestions in this regard and stands ready

to participate actively and constructively in the process.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I announce clearly that the occupation of other countries under the pretext of

freedom and democracy is an unforgivable crime.

The world needs the logic of compassion and justice and inclusive participation

instead oflogic offorce, domination, unilateralism, war and intimidation.

The world needs to be governed by virtuous people like the Divine Prophets.

The two vast geographical spheres, namely Africa and Latin America, have gone

through historic developments during the past decades. The new approaches in these

two continents, which are based on increasing level of integration and unity as well as

on localizing the growth and development models, have born considerable fruits to the

‘peoples of those regions. The awareness and wisdom of the leaders of these two

continents has overcome the regional problems and crises without the domineering

interference of non-regional powers.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has expanded its relations with the Latin America

and Africa in all aspects in recent years.

And about the glorious Iran,

The Tehran Declaration was a hugely constructive step in confidence building

efforts which was made possible through the admirable good will by the governments

of Brazil and Turkey along with the sincere cooperation of the Iranian government.

Although the Declaration received inappropriate reaction by some and was

followed by an unlawful resolution, it is still valid.

We have observed the regulations of the IAEA more than our commitments, yet,

we have never submitted to illegally imposed pressures nor will we ever do so.

It has been said that they want to pressure Iran into a dialogue. Well, firstly, Iran

has always been ready for a dialogue based on respect and justice. Secondly, methods

based on disrespecting nations have long become ineffective. Those who have used

intimidation and sanctions in response to the clear logic of the Iranian nation are in

real terms destroying the remaining credibility of the Security Council and the trust of

nations for this body, proving once and again how unjust is the function of the


When they threaten a great nation such as Iran which is known throughout history

for its scientists, poets, artists and philosophers and whose culture and civilization is

synonymous to purity, submission to God and seeking justice, how can they ever

expect that other nations grow confidence on them?

It goes without saying that domineering methods in managing the world has failed.

Not only has the era of slavery and colonialism and dominating the world passed, the

path to the reviving old Empires are blocked, too.

We have announced that we stand ready for a serious and free debate with the

American Statesmen to express our transparent views on issues of importance to the

world in this very venue.

It is proposed here that in order to have a constructive dialogue, an annual free

debate be organized within the General Assembly.

In conclusion,

Friends and Colleagues,

The Iranian nation and the majority of the world’s nations and governments are

against the current discriminatory management of the world.

The inhumane nature of this management has put it at a dead-end and requires a

major overhaul.

Reforming the world’s affairs and bringing about tranquility and prosperity

requires the participation of all, pure thoughts and the divine and humane


We are all ofthe idea that:

Justice is the basic element for peace, durable security and the spread of love

among peoples and nations. It is in the justice that mankind seeks the realization of his

aspirations, rights and dignity, since he is wary of oppression, humiliation and ill


The true nature of mankind is manifested in the love for other fellow humans and

love for all the good in the world. Love is the best foundation for establishing relation

amongst people and amongst nations.

As Vahshi Bafqi, the great Iranian poet, says:

“From the fountain of youth, drink thousand sips

You’ll still die if you don’t have love’s grip”

In making a world full of purity, safety and prosperity people are not rivals but


Those who see their happiness but in the sorrow of others and their welfare and

safety but in others’ insecurity, those who see themselves superior to others, are out of

the path of humanity and are in evil’s course.

Economy and materialistic means are only some tools to serve others, to create

friendship and strengthen human connections for spiritual perfection. They are not

tools for show-off or means of dominating others.

Men and women complements each other and family unit with pure, loving and

long-lasting relation of the spouses in its center is the guarantee for the continuity and

the bringing up generations, for true pleasures, for spreading love and for reforming of

the societies.

Woman is a reflection of God’s beauty and is the source of love and caring. She is

the guardian of purity and exquisiteness of the society.

The tendency to toughen the souls and behaviors of women deprives them from

their very basic right of being a loving mother and a caring wife. It would result in a

more violent society with irreversible defects.

Freedom is a divine right that should serve peace and human perfection.

Pure thoughts and the will of the righteous are keys to the gates of a pure life full

of hope, liveliness and beauty.

This is the promise of God that the earth will be inherited by the pure and the

righteous. And the people free from selfishness will take up the management of the

world. Then, there will be no trace of sorrow, discrimination, poverty, insecurity and

aggression. The time for true happiness and for the blossoming of the true nature of

humankind, the way God has intended, will arrive.

All those seeking for justice and all the free spirits have been waiting for this

moment and have promised such glorious time.

The complete human, the true servant of God and the true friend of the mankind

whose father was from the generation of the beloved Prophet of Islam and whose

mother was from the true believers of the Jesus Christ, shall wait along with Jesus the

son of Marry and the other righteous to appear on those brilliant times and assist the


In welcoming them we should join ranks and seek justice.

Praise to Love and worship, praise to justice and freedom, praise to the true

humanity, the complete human, the true companion of the humankind and peace be

upon you and all the righteous and the pure.

Thank you."