Thursday, September 15, 2011

SCHOLARS FOR 9/11 TRUTH & JUSTICE: science-based demolition hypothesis alternative to the "official story" of 9-11

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice in their own words: “We are a group of scholars and supporters endeavoring to address the unanswered questions of the September 11, 2001 attack through scientific research and public education. We take care to present the strongest, most credible research available, some of which is published on our sister site, the Journal of 9/11 Studies (see: ).

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice on controlled demolition of WTC on 9-11: The principle alternative to the official theory that the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 suffered spontaneous structural collapses is the theory that they were destroyed through controlled demolition by pre-positioned devices. This is the only serious alternative to the official theory, since the other theories -- such as those involving exotic weapons or accidental explosions -- lack even rudimentary plausibility. Given this dichotomy, a disproof of the collapse theory in its most general form constitutes a proof of the demolition theory in its most general form. Any comprehensive theory describing the means and methods of controlled demolition applied to the WTC buildings is necessarily speculative, particularly given the paucity of artifacts that survived the Ground Zero cleanup operation. However, specific sets observations may indicate the use of certain demolition methods, perhaps as part of wider array of methods. One such set of observations has been adduced by Dr. Steven E Jones as evidence of the use of aluminothermics in the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers. Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?
by Dr. Steven E Jones.” [1].

[1]. Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, “Hypotheses: principal alternative theories of the attack”: .

No comments:

Post a Comment