Andreas von Bülow, German Minister & intelligence intimate: 9/11 a covert US false flag operation

Andreas von Bülow, was born on 17 July 1937. He served as state-secretary in the German Federal Ministry of Defence (1976-1980), as German Minister for Research and Technology (1980-1982) and for 25 years overall as an SPD member of the German parliament (1969-1994). In the late 1980s and early 1990s, he served on the parliamentary committee on intelligence services ("Parlamentarischer Kontrollausschuss") (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_von_B%C3%BClow ).

Andreas von Bülow on US intelligence and US Government involvement in the 9/11 atrocity (2002): “Planning the attacks was a master deed, in technical and organizational terms. To hijack four big airliners within a few minutes and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing so on complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing from the secret apparatuses of state and industry… If what I say is right, the whole US government should end up behind bars…They have hidden behind a veil of secrecy and destroyed the evidence - that they invented the story of 19 Muslims working within Osama bin Laden’s al-Qa'eda - in order to hide the truth of their own covert operation.” [1].

[1]. Andreas von Bulow, Tagesspiegel, 13. Jan. 2002; quoted here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_von_B%C3%BClow .

Albert Stubblebine, former Head of US Army Intelligence: explosive demolition of WTC buildings on 9/11 & Media, Government lying

Major General Albert N. Stubblebine was a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy West Point, class of 52, and had a distinguished 32 year career in the U.S. Army. He retired as the Commanding General of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command, INSCOM (see Wikipedia: : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Stubblebine ).

Major General Albert N. Stubblebine on explosive demolition of the WTC buildings in the 9-11 atrocity and subsequent Government and Mainstream media lying (2009): “You look at the buildings falling, they didn’t fall down because of an airplane hit them, they fell down because explosives went off inside. Demolition. Look at Building 7 for God sakes … I do not believe the free press is free anymore… The press is saying what they have been told to say about this. Now do I have proof about this? No. But I believe that all the stories that were told about 9/11 were false… What is it they do not want the public to know?” [1].

Major General Albert Stubblebine in a video documentary (2006): “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, “The plane does not fit in that hole”. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?” [2].

[1]. “Major General Albert Stubblebine: Towers fell down because of explosives”, World for 9-11 Truth, 29 June 2009: http://world911truth.org/major-general-albert-stubblebine-towers-fell-down-because-of-explosives/ ).

[2]. Major General Albert Stubblebine, quoted in “USA military officers challenge official account of September 11”, Axis of Logic, 29 May 2008 (ex Pakistan Daily) : http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/printer_26828.shtml .

SCHOLARS FOR 9/11 TRUTH & JUSTICE: science-based demolition hypothesis alternative to the "official story" of 9-11

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice in their own words: “We are a group of scholars and supporters endeavoring to address the unanswered questions of the September 11, 2001 attack through scientific research and public education. We take care to present the strongest, most credible research available, some of which is published on our sister site, the Journal of 9/11 Studies ” (see: http://stj911.org/index.html ).

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice on controlled demolition of WTC on 9-11: “The principle alternative to the official theory that the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 suffered spontaneous structural collapses is the theory that they were destroyed through controlled demolition by pre-positioned devices. This is the only serious alternative to the official theory, since the other theories -- such as those involving exotic weapons or accidental explosions -- lack even rudimentary plausibility. Given this dichotomy, a disproof of the collapse theory in its most general form constitutes a proof of the demolition theory in its most general form. Any comprehensive theory describing the means and methods of controlled demolition applied to the WTC buildings is necessarily speculative, particularly given the paucity of artifacts that survived the Ground Zero cleanup operation. However, specific sets observations may indicate the use of certain demolition methods, perhaps as part of wider array of methods. One such set of observations has been adduced by Dr. Steven E Jones as evidence of the use of aluminothermics in the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers. Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?
by Dr. Steven E Jones.” [1].

[1]. Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, “Hypotheses: principal alternative theories of the attack”: http://stj911.org/hypotheses/alternative.html .

Professor Peter Hans Santschi, environmental chemist, disputes "official story" of 9-11

Peter Hans Santschi has been Professor of Oceanography and Marine Sciences, Texas A&M University since 1988 in the fields of Chemistry, Marine and Environmental Chemistry (see: http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/mempages/Santschi.html ).

Professor Peter Hans Santschi on 9-11: “"The official story does not make sense, because it flies in the face of scientific principles and the laws of science. You cannot fool Newton's Laws, which means that the official story on how the three WTC towers fell on their footprint at near-free-fall acceleration due to fires insults anybody's mind who is still able to think on their own. And that you cannot melt steel by burning jet fuel should be evident to anybody who has ever watched airplane engines burn jet fuel without the steel of the engines melting. What is even more incredulous is that there are not more people in the USA questioning the official story.” [1].

[1]. Scientists for 9-11 truth, “Peter Hans Santschi”: http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/mempages/Santschi.html .

Dr Alan Sabrosky, Jewish American ex-Marine: "It is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation"

Dr Alan Sabrosky is Jewish American, a PhD from the University of Michigan, a US Marine Corps veteran, a Vietnam veteran, a graduate of the US Army War College and a Director of Studies at the US Army War College for 5 and a half years (see: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23460.htm ).

Dr Alan Sabrosky on the PNAC Pearl Harbor strategy, the explosive demolition if the WTC and the need for assistance (US, Israeli) on the ground (2009): “The attacks on September 11, 2001 have been a defining moment for America. The political and psychological impact on Americans of a concerted and visible attack in America was enormous -- indeed, it is an interesting "coincidence" that the attacks occurred on the one day of the year whose mention reinforces a public sense here of danger and emergency: 9-1-1. A significant development in the 1990s was the formation of the neo-conservative think tank known as PNAC (Project for a New American Century), whose members prepared position papers for the Israeli government and for a future US Administration sharing their views. That happened in 2000 with the election of George W. Bush, and a contemporary writer summarized the tip of the neo-conservative iceberg in his first Administration this way: The "outsiders" from PNAC were now powerful "insiders," placed in important positions from which they could exert maximum pressure on US policy…PNAC had a lock on military policy-creation in the Bush Administration. Especially significant in terms of subsequent events was the acknowledgement in one of PNAC's own documents that their program for America (and Israel) would not readily be accepted by the American people. What this meant, PNAC opined in 2000, was that "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor… First, the striking aircraft alone simply could not have brought down either of the two buildings in the manner in which they fell, much less a third building which was not hit by a plane…This means the attackers had assistance on the ground, and it had to have been active before the attacks occurred: preparing buildings for controlled demolition is not something done haphazardly in the midst of chaos. Second, only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets, access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground: our CIA and Israel's Mossad. Only one had the incentive, using the “who benefits” principle: Mossad. And that incentive dovetailed perfectly with the neo-con’s agenda and explicitly expressed need for a catalytic event to mobilize the American public for their wars, using American military power to destroy Israel’s enemies.” [1].

Dr Alan Sabrosky in interview with Mark Glenn and a USS Liberty survivor (Phil Tourney) on Israeli responsibility for 9-11 and the dire consequences for decent, patriotic Jewish Americans if this becomes generally accepted (2010): “What we need to stand up and say is that not only did they attack the USS Liberty, they did 9/11. They did it. I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period. You know, Phil, I don't denigrate what happened to USS Liberty in the slightest - you understand that - but for most Americans what happened to the USS Liberty, or in Vietnam, was history. Now this is history. You know, they can be concerned about it, but they're not going to get mad about it. 9/11 has led directly to 60,000 Americans dead and wounded, God knows how many hundreds of thousands of people in other countries that we've killed or wounded or made homeless, and it's an on-going sore. It's not your sore from the USS Liberty, it's not my sore from Vietnam. Both of us have those, both of us care about. But this is an open wound. And what Americans need to understand is that they did it. They did it. And if they do understand that, Israel's going to disappear. Israel will flat-ass disappear from this Earth.I sent a film to one of my colleagues and it basically had Americans grieving over their dead coming back. And I showed one of them - it was a woman - just wrenched by grief over her dead soldier. And I said, you know, if Americans ever know that Israel did this, they're gonna scrub them off the Earth, and they're not gonna give a rat's ass - forgive my language - what the cost is. They are not going to care. They will do it. And they should. And they should.” [2].

[1]. Dr Alan Sabrosky, “Treason, betrayal and deceit: 9/11 and beyond”, Information Clearing House, 10 September 2009: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23460.htm .

[2]. Dr Alan Sabrosky in interview with Mark Glenn (2010), Full transcript of interview, Uprooted Palestinians, 21 March 2010: http://uprootedpalestinians.blogspot.com/2010/03/full-transcript-of-sabrosky-interview.html .

Dr Paul Craig Roberts: Government & MSM lying & "[US] government’s 9/11 conspiracy theory"

Paul Craig Roberts (born April 3, 1939, in Atlanta, Georgia) is an economist and a nationally syndicated columnist for Creators Syndicate; served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration (so-called father of Reaganomics”, and former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service. PhD from University of Virginia, he has written or co-written eight books, contributed chapters to numerous books and has published many articles in journals of scholarship. He has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Craig_Roberts ).

Dr Paul Craig Roberts on truth, liberty, media lying and US government’s 9-11 conspiracy theory: “There was a time when the pen was mightier than the sword. That was a time when people believed in truth and regarded truth as an independent power and not as an auxiliary for government, class, race, ideological, personal, or financial interest. Today Americans are ruled by propaganda. Americans have little regard for truth, little access to it, and little ability to recognize it. Truth is an unwelcome entity. It is disturbing. It is off limits. Those who speak it run the risk of being branded “anti-American,” “anti-semite” or “conspiracy theorist.” Truth is an inconvenience for government and for the interest groups whose campaign contributions control government. Truth is an inconvenience for prosecutors who want convictions, not the discovery of innocence or guilt. Truth is inconvenient for ideologues. Today many whose goal once was the discovery of truth are now paid handsomely to hide it... The American corporate does not serve the truth. It serves the government and the interest groups that empower the government. America’s fate was sealed when the public and the anti-war movement bought the government’s 9/11 conspiracy theory. The government’s account of 9/11 is contradicted by much evidence. Nevertheless, this defining event of our time, which has launched the US on interminable wars of aggression and a domestic police state, is a taboo topic for investigation in the media. It is pointless to complain of war and a police state when one accepts the premise upon which they are based. These trillion dollar wars have created financing problems for Washington’s deficits and threaten the U.S. dollar’s role as world reserve currency. The wars and the pressure that the budget deficits put on the dollar’s value have put Social Security and Medicare on the chopping block.” [1].

[1]. Paul Craig Roberts, “Goodbye. Truith has fallen and taken liberty with it”, 9-11 Blogger.com, 24 March 2010: http://911blogger.com/node/23027 .

Former Malaysian PM Dr Mahathir Mohamad: American Government did 9-11

Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad (born 10 July 1925) was the fourth Prime Minister of Malaysia (1981 – 2003), Dr Mahathir was Malaysia's longest serving Prime Minister and has a remarkable legacy: according to WHO (see: http://www.who.int/countries/en/), for Malaysia the "probability of dying under five (per 1 000 live births)" is 6 as compared to 8 for the US (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahathir_Mohamad ).

Dr Mahathir Mohamad saying that 9-11 was not the work of Muslims (2011): “For some Americans, the deaths of nearly 3,000 people was not the scariest thing about 9/11. It was realizing who carried out the attack: yes, the American Government…The planning [for the 9/11 attacks] must have taken a considerable length of time. The candidates had to learn to fly in tiny aircrafts…. Planning to hijack four aircraft simultaneously would require great precision in timing and logistics. One aircraft maybe. But four simultaneously!! I don't think extremists from Saudi Arabia can carry out this highly sophisticated operation with such success…They [WTC buildings] came down nicely upon themselves without toppling against the other buildings close by. It looks more like planned demolition of buildings than collapse consequent upon being hit by aircraft. A third building also collapsed in the same fashion; although it was not hit by any aircraft. What is the explanation for this untouched building, which collapsed upon itself and did not damage other buildings nearby?... “[At the Pentagon] there was no debris of any kind, no broken parts of the aircraft, no black box, and no human bodies flung into the surroundings. Is it possible for an aircraft to vaporize totally after a crash?... Again [in Pennsylvania] no sign of any debris. No big crater. Did it vaporize into nothingness? Did the innocent passengers also vaporize?” [1].

[1]. Dr Mahathir Mohamad quoted in “9/11 was not work of Muslim groups: Mahathir Mohamad” , Teheran Times, 14 September 2011: http://www.tehrantimes.com/world/2407-911-was-not-a-handi-work-of-muslim-groups-mahathir-mohamad/ .